4.5 Article

Compassion in healthcare - lessons from a qualitative study of the end of life care of people with dementia

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages 492-497

Publisher

ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0141076813503593

Keywords

older people; dementia; compassion; healthcare

Funding

  1. St Lukes Hospice Winsford Cheshire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: A lack of compassion in UK healthcare settings has received much recent attention. This study explores the experiences of people with dementia in the last year of life and time surrounding death and how the presence and lack of compassion, kindness and humanity influenced the experience of care. Design: Qualitative in-depth interviews with bereaved informal carers of people with dementia. Setting: United Kingdom. Participants: Forty bereaved carers-31 women and nine men-with an age range of 18-86 years and from wide socioeconomic backgrounds participated. Main outcome measures: Experiences of carers of care for person with dementia during last year of life. Results: The interviews highlighted differences and challenges in care settings in providing compassionate, humanistic care and the impact of the care experienced by the person with dementia during the last year of life on informal carers during the bereavement period and beyond. Excellent examples of compassionate care were experienced alongside very poor and inhumane practices. Conclusion: The concepts of compassion, kindness and humanity in dementia care are discussed within the paper. The ability to deliver care that is compassionate, kind and humanistic exists along a continuum across care settings examples of excellent care sit alongside examples of very poor care and the reasons for this are explored together with discussion as to how health and social care staff can be trained and supported to deliver compassionate care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available