4.6 Article

Simultaneous reconstruction of evolutionary history and epidemiological dynamics from viral sequences with the birth-death SIR model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 11, Issue 94, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.1106

Keywords

phylodynamics; Bayesian phylogenetics; birth-death prior; mathematical epidemiology

Funding

  1. Royal Society of New Zealand [UOA0809]
  2. ETH Zurich
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [PZ00P3 136820]
  4. Allan Wilson Centre
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P3_136820] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolution of RNA viruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus and influenza virus, occurs so rapidly that the viruses' genomes contain information on past ecological dynamics. Hence, we develop a phylodynamic method that enables the joint estimation of epidemiological parameters and phylogenetic history. Based on a compartmental susceptible-infected-removed (SIR) model, this method provides separate information on incidence and prevalence of infections. Detailed information on the interaction of host population dynamics and evolutionary history can inform decisions on how to contain or entirely avoid disease outbreaks. We apply our birth-death SIR method to two viral datasets. First, five HIV type 1 clusters sampled in the UK between 1999 and 2003 are analysed. The estimated basic reproduction ratios range from 1.9 to 3.2 among the clusters. All clusters show a decline in the growth rate of the local epidemic in the middle or end of the 1990s. The analysis of a hepatitis C virus genotype 2c dataset shows that the local epidemic in the Cordoban city Cruz del Eje originated around 1906 (median), coinciding with an immigration wave from Europe to central Argentina that dates from 1880 to 1920. The estimated time of epidemic peak is around 1970.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available