4.6 Article

Slippery pores: anti-adhesive effect of nanoporous substrates on the beetle attachment system

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 7, Issue 52, Pages 1571-1579

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0081

Keywords

absorption; adhesion; attachment; insect; roughness; porosity

Funding

  1. The National Institute for Material Science (Tsukuba, Japan)
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [BMBF 01 RB 0802A]
  3. German Science Foundation (DFG) [GO 995/9-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traction experiments with adult seven-spotted ladybird beetles Coccinella septempunctata (L.) were carried out to study the influence of surface structure on insect attachment. Force measurements were performed with tethered walking insects, both males and females, on five different substrates: (i) smooth glass plate, (ii) smooth solid Al2O3 (sapphire) disc, and (iii-v) porous Al2O3 discs (anodisc membranes) with the same pore diameter but different porosity. The traction force of beetles ranged from 0.16 to 16.59 mN in males and from 0.32 to 8.99 mN in females. In both sexes, the highest force values were obtained on smooth solid surfaces, where males showed higher forces than females. On all three porous substrates, forces were significantly reduced in both males and females, and the only difference within these surfaces was obtained between membranes with the highest and lowest porosity. Males produced essentially lower forces than females on porous samples. The reduction in insect attachment on anodisc membranes may be explained by (i) possible absorption of the secretion fluid from insect adhesive pads by porous media and/or (ii) the effect of surface roughness. Differences in attachment between males and females were probably caused by the sexual dimorphism in the terminal structure of adhesive setae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available