4.1 Article

Retinal angiotensin II and angiotensin-(1-7) response to hyperglycemia and an intervention with captopril

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1470320318789323

Keywords

Angiotensin II; angiotensin-(1-7); angiotensin-converting enzyme; diabetes; blindness; retinopathy

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [UD01 DK076162, EY027750]
  2. National Eye Institute P30 Core Grant [P30EY025585]
  3. Case Medical School Cleveland Clinic Translational Research Consortium
  4. Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothesis: Hyperglycemia decreases angiotensin-(1-7), the endogenous counter-regulator of angiotensin II in the retina. Materials and methods: The distribution and levels of retinal angiotensin II (Ang II) and angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)) were evaluated by confocal imaging and quantitative immunohistochemistry during the development of streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. Results: In the nondiabetic eye, Ang II was localized to the endfeet of Muller cells, extending into the cellular processes of the inner plexiform layer and inner nuclear layer; Ang-(1-7) showed a wider distribution, extending from the foot plates of the Muller cells to the photoreceptor layer. Eyes from diabetic animals showed a higher intensity and extent of Ang II staining compared with nondiabetic eyes, but lower intensity with a reduced distribution of Ang-(1-7) immunoreactivity. Treatment of the diabetic animals with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) captopril showed a reduced intensity of Ang II staining, whereas increased intensity and distribution were evident with Ang-(1-7) staining. Conclusions: These studies reveal that pharmacological inhibition with ACEIs may provide a specific intervention for the management of the diabetes-induced decline in retinal function, reversing the profile of the endogenous angiotensin peptides closer to the normal condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available