4.2 Article

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of paraproteinemic demyelinating neuropathies. Report of a Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society - first revision

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 185-195

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2010.00278.x

Keywords

demyelinating; guidelines; MAG; monoclonal gammopathy; neuropathy; paraprotein; POEMS; treatment

Funding

  1. Grifols
  2. Biogen-Idec
  3. Baxter
  4. Laboratoire Francais du Biofractionnement (LFB)
  5. Octapharma
  6. Schering
  7. Bayer
  8. Sanquin blood supply foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this guideline is to update the 2006 EFNS/PNS guideline on management of patients with a demyelinating neuropathy and a paraprotein (paraproteinemic demyelinating neuropathy [PDN]) by review of evidence and expert consensus. In the absence of adequate evidence, the panel agreed on good practice points: (1) patients with PDN should be investigated for a malignant plasma cell dyscrasia; (2) a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is more likely to be causing the neuropathy if it is immunoglobulin (Ig)M, anti-neural antibodies are present, and the clinical phenotype is chronic distal sensory neuropathy; (3) patients with IgM PDN usually have predominantly distal sensory impairment, prolonged distal motor latencies, and often anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies; (4) IgM PDN may respond to immunomodulatory therapies. Their potential benefit should be balanced against possible side effects and the usually slow disease progression; (5) IgG and IgA PDN may be indistinguishable from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; and (6) Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, Monoclonal gammopathy, and Skin changes syndrome is a multi-system malignant PDN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available