Journal
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 793-804Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2012.188
Keywords
History of O.R; Philosophy of O.R; Practice of O.R
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The address explores three questions that are important for operational research: 'Where do we come from?', 'What are we?' and 'Where are we going?' First, it looks briefly at the history of O.R. from Babbage to Blackett and the importance of a 'union of theory and practice' in our work. Then it looks at O.R.'s identity and image and argues that we do have a reasonably clear idea of our identity, although we do not give sufficient prominence to our contribution to improving system design. It also argues that the 'brand image' of O.R. has become diluted and needs to be simple, distinctive, relevant and compelling. In considering how we might achieve that, by addressing the third question, it proposes that we should grow our capability and activity in accommodating 'analytics', in building in behavioural science, in coping with complex systems, in developing design thinking and in encouraging evaluation. It also suggests strengthening bridges between academics and practitioners, between those working in different specialisms and in diverse sectors and between O.R. and the public. Finally, it argues that such developments would assist O.R. to reinforce our bridge between science and the humanities and enable us to better meet the challenges of the 'real world'.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available