4.7 Article

LES-DPM simulation of turbulent gas-particle flow on opposed round jets

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 270, Issue -, Pages 302-311

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.10.039

Keywords

Opposed round jets; Large eddy simulation; Vortex structure evolution; Particle motions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A three-dimensional simulation was performed on the turbulent gas-solid flow in a cylindrical channel with opposed round jets. Large eddy simulation (LES) coupled with discrete phase model (DPM) was employed for carrier gas and laden particles respectively, to investigate the turbulent gas-solid behaviors. Simulations were focused on the effects of particle sizes (d(p) = 5 mu m, 14 mu m and 40 mu m), Stokes numbers (St = 0.125, 1 and 8), mass flux ratios (Z(m) = 0.00128, 0.035 and 0.66) and initial gas velocities (U-0 = 15 m/s, 25 m/s and 35 m/s) on the vortex structure evolution, particle motion, time-averaged velocity profiles and turbulence intensity. It was found that the evolutions of vortex structure, including the destruction of large scale coherent structures to tiny vortices and the lateral spreading of vortices at the impingement zone, were augmented when using smaller particles and higher initial gas velocities. In addition, particles followed more closely and were easier to reach quasi-equilibrium state with the decrease of Stokes number (St < 1), whereas more particles penetrated the impingement plane when increasing the Stokes number (St> 1). And, with the increase of mass flux ratio, the momentum transfer was augmented as well as the turbulence intensity. Moreover, the position (r(m)) with maximum radial velocity was almost independent of the initial gas velocity on far-spaced opposed round jets. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available