3.9 Article

Sediment instability affects the rate and location of primary production and respiration in a sand-bed stream

Journal

Publisher

NORTH AMER BENTHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1899/07-143.1

Keywords

sediment; stream metabolism; sediment stability; primary production; stream velocity; hyporheic zone

Funding

  1. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Creightons Creek, a rural stream in southeastern Australia, has been severely degraded by large-scale sedimentation of sand in the streambed. Our paper highlights the use of whole-stream metabolism measurements, fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis studies, and in situ enzyme mapping to examine the effect of sediment instability on benthic and hyporheic metabolism across seasonal and flow variations in Creightons Creek. Median gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER24) rates, determined over a 20-mo period with the whole-stream single-station diurnal 02 change method, ranged between 0 and 0.5 g O-2 m(-2) d(-1) and 0.6 and 3.7 g O-2 m(-2) d(-1), respectively. These values gave photosynthesis/respiration (P/R) ratios between 0.00 and 0.41, indicative of a heterotrophic system. Creightons Creek was expected to support higher GPP because it has an open canopy, clear water, warm temperatures, and sufficient nutrients. However, this once-clay-bottomed stream now has an abrasive benthic layer of sand that moves continuously, even at low flows, and this layer has inhibited the growth of benthic primary producers (0-2 mg/m(2) of chlorophyll a). During high flows, when scour and abrasion from the bed movement were at a maximum, the highest relative enzyme activity was located in the hyporheic zone at a depth of 7 to 12 cm, where the sediment was more stable. During low flows, the highest enzyme activity occurred in the upper 4 cm of the sediment profile. Our study shows that the instability of the sediment bed is a major factor determining the rates and locations of metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available