4.5 Article

Low-contrast acuity measures visual improvement in phase 3 trial of natalizumab in relapsing MS

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 318, Issue 1-2, Pages 119-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.03.009

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis (MS); Vision; Low-contrast letter acuity; Natalizumab

Funding

  1. Actelion
  2. Biogen Idec
  3. Bayer Schering
  4. Teva
  5. Merck-Serono
  6. Novartis
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. UCB
  9. Roche
  10. Antisense Therapeutics
  11. Schering AG
  12. Serono
  13. Bayer
  14. Allergan
  15. EMD Serono
  16. Novo-nordisk
  17. Vertex
  18. Genentech
  19. Abbott
  20. Elan Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Low-contrast letter acuity has demonstrated treatment effects for sustained visual loss in trials of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). To test new therapies that may involve neuroprotection and repair, it will be essential for outcome measures to detect improvement as well as loss of visual function. We determined the effects of natalizumab on the frequency and cumulative probability of visual improvement using low-contrast letter acuity a prespecified tertiary outcome measure in AFFIRM. Methods: AFFIRM was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that evaluated efficacy and safety of natalizumab (n = 627) vs. placebo (n = 315) in relapsing-remitting MS. Binocular acuities were measured at low-contrast (1.25%, 2.5%) and high-contrast visual acuity (VA). Improvement was defined as 12-week sustained increases from baseline. Clinically meaningful change for primary analyses was pre-defined as 7-letter improvement for low-contrast acuity and 5-letter improvement for VA based upon previous studies. Results: Compared to placebo, cumulative probabilities of sustained visual improvement were greater in the natalizumab group by 57% for 2.5% contrast (21.7% vs. 14.0%; HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.11-2.22; P=0.012) and 39% for 1.25% contrast (32.5% vs. 25.0%; HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.07-1.82; P=0.014). The 5- and 10-letter low-contrast assessments did not show treatment differences. High-contrast VA was insensitive to changes over time and treatment effects. Conclusion: Low-contrast letter acuity detected treatment effects on sustained visual improvement in patients with relapsing MS. The ability to detect visual improvement and loss makes low-contrast acuity an important measure for future trials assessing the impact of therapy on this outcome and the potential of a therapy for neuroprotection and repair. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available