4.5 Review

Review of the etiologies of viral meningitis and encephalitis in a dengue endemic region

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 303, Issue 1-2, Pages 75-79

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.01.012

Keywords

Encephalitis; Meningitis; Viral infections; Cerebrospinal fluid; Dengue; Enterovirus; Herpes simplex

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E-26/170]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To evaluate the etiology of viral meningitis and encephalitis in adults and adolescents living in areas affected by dengue. Methods: Over two years, adults and adolescents with diagnoses of viral encephalitis or meningitis were selected for study in Brazil. PCRs for dengue, enterovirus. HSV1 and 2 and cytomegalovirus were performed in CSF samples. Serum and CSF samples were tested for the presence of anti-dengue IgM antibodies. Results: The etiologies of encephalitis and meningitis were determined in 70% of cases (30/47). Dengue was the leading cause of encephalitis (47%) with normal CSF cellularity in 75% of these patients. HSV1 was found in 17.6% of the cases, two of which had mild encephalitis. Enterovirus was the most common cause of meningitis (50%), followed by HSV1 (15%), cytomegalovirus and dengue (10%, each). Conclusions: We identified the viral agents causing encephalitis and meningitis in a higher proportion of cases than has been reported in other studies. Dengue was the most frequent cause of encephalitis, which surpassed HSV. In endemic areas, dengue should be investigated as an important cause of encephalitis. Normal CSF cellularity should not exclude dengue encephalitis. Enterovirus is known to be the leading cause of meningitis in children, but here we found it was also the main cause of the disease in adults. HSV1 should be investigated in patients with mild forms of encephalitis and meningitis. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available