4.5 Article

Association of ALS with head injury, cigarette smoking and APOE genotypes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 291, Issue 1-2, Pages 22-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.01.011

Keywords

Case-control study; US veterans; Candidate gene; Gene-environment interaction; Neurodegeneration

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [R01 ES 013244]
  2. ALS Association [ALSA 1230]
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs [CSP 500A, CSP 478]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: An increased risk of ALS has been reported for US veterans, but the cause is unknown. Since head injury and cigarette smoking are two previously implicated environmental risk factors that are more common in military than civilian study populations, we tested their association with ALS in a US veteran study population. Methods: We used logistic regression to examine the association of ALS with head injury and cigarette smoking in 241 incident cases and 597 controls. Since APOE is a plausible ALS candidate gene, we also tested its main effect and its statistical interaction with these environmental exposures. Results: Cigarette smoking was not associated with ALS in this predominantly male and Caucasian population. Veterans who had experienced head injuries during the last 15 years before the reference date had an adjusted odds ratio of 2.33 (95% confidence interval 1.18-4.61), relative to veterans without any head injuries. This association was strongest in APOE-4 carriers. Conclusions: Our results add to the body of evidence suggesting that head injuries may be a risk factor for multiple neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS. We hypothesize that the strength of association between head injuries and ALS may depend upon APOE genotype. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available