4.5 Article

Presence of CSF oligoclonal bands (OCB) is associated with the HLA-DRB1 genotype in a West Australian multiple sclerosis cohort

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 288, Issue 1-2, Pages 63-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.10.005

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; Oligoclonal bands; HLA-DRB1; Australian

Funding

  1. National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia Postgraduate Training Scholarship
  3. University of Western Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-resolution HLA-DRB1 genotyping was performed in 97 OCB-positive and 68 OCB-negative cases with demyelinating disease to determine the influence of HLA-DRB1 alleles on the presence of OCB in a West Australian multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort. Carriage of the HLA-DRB1*1501 allele was associated with both OCB-positive and OCB-negative MS compared with controls, but more strongly with the OCB-positive group, and increased the likelihood of having OCB 2.1-fold with evidence of a dominant dose-effect. The HLA-DRB1*0301 allele was negatively correlated with OCB, with all homozygotes OCB-negative, suggesting a possible recessive protective effect of HLA-DRB1*0301. There was no significant correlation between OCB and the DRB1*04 alleles which have been associated with OCB-negative MS in previous Swedish and Japanese studies. Evidence of allelic interactions was found with HLA-DRB1*1501/*1301 heterozygotes having a reduced frequency of OCB and HLA-DRB1*0301/*0401 heterozygotes all being OCB-negative. These findings confirm the strong association between HLA-DRB1*1501 and OCB which has been found in other populations but indicate that the influence of other HLA-DRB1 alleles varies in different populations. Our study is the first to show that HLA-DRB1 allele interactions and dose-effects influence the frequency of OCB. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available