4.5 Article

Long-term open-label study of pramipexole in patients with primary restless legs syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 294, Issue 1-2, Pages 62-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.04.003

Keywords

Augmentation; Japanese patients; Nonergot dopamine agonist; Phase III long-term clinical study; Pramipexole; Restless legs syndrome

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
  2. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A phase III, open-label, long-term clinical study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pramipexole in a cohort of 141 Japanese patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS). The patients were started on pramipexole 0.25 mg/day and were subsequently maintained on that dose or switched to 0.125, 0.5, or 0.75 mg/day to achieve optimal efficacy and tolerability. The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale for restless legs syndrome (IRLS) score improved from 22.3 +/- 4.7 at baseline to 11.1 +/- 7.7 at week 8 and 4.9 +/- 5.9 at week 52. IRLS responders, defined as patients whose IRIS total score decreased by >= 50% from baseline, accounted for 67.4% at week 12 and 86.6% at week 52. Over 90% of patients were Clinical Global Impression-global improvement (CGI-I) and Patient Global Impression (PGI) responders. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score decreased from 7.9+/-3.1 at baseline to 4.6+/-2.9 at week 52. Similarly, the Japanese version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score decreased from 9.3+/-5.2 to 4.9+/-3.8. Baseline IRIS score 20 was significantly associated with a complete IRIS response in this long-term study. Adverse events were typical of nonergot dopamine agonists, mild in intensity, and decreased in frequency as the study progressed. RLS augmentation was not observed. Pramipexole 0.25-0.75 mg/day is efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in patients with RLS. Pramipexole showed good efficacy, particularly in patients with an IRIS total score <20. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available