Journal
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 282, Issue 1-2, Pages 96-105Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.04.010
Keywords
Multiple sclerosis; Optic neuritis; OCT; GDx; MRI; Low letter contrast acuity; Lesion volume; Brain atrophy; Magnetization transfer imaging; Diffusion tensor imaging
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in multiple sclerosis (MS) is gaining increasing attention. Objectives: To explore the relationship between RNFL thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (GDx), and conventional and non-conventional optic nerve and brain MRI measures. Methods: Twelve relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients (12 affected and 12 unaffected eyes) and 4 age- and sex-matched normal controls (NC) (8 unaffected eyes) were enrolled. Four MS patients had a history of bilateral optic neuritis (ON), four had a history of unilateral ON, and 4 had no history of ON. Optic nerve MRI measurements included the length of T2 lesions, measurement of optic nerve atrophy, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures. Optic nerve atrophy was measured by a novel method with high reproducibility. Brain MRI measurements included T1 and T2 lesion volumes (LVs) and their relative MTRs, and tissue class specific atrophy, MTR and DTI measures. Measures of RNFL were evaluated with OCT and GDx. We also evaluated both high and low contrast letter acuities (LCLA) in order to determine the relationship between vision, MRI metrics, and retinal structural architecture. Results: LCLA, RNFL-OCT and optic nerve radius measures showed more robust differences between NC and MS patients, and between MS patients with affected and unaffected eyes. T2-LV and T1-LV, as well as gray matter atrophy, DTI and MTR measures were related to LCLA and RNFL thickness. Unique additive variance regression models showed that both brain and optic nerve MRI measures independently accounted for about 50% of the variance in LCLA and RNFL thickness. In reverse models, about 20% of the additional independent variance was explained by optic nerve or brain MRI metrics. Conclusions: Measurement of RNFL thickness and radius of the optic nerve should be preferred to the other optic nerve MRI measures in clinical studies. Whole brain lesion and GM measures are predictive of impaired visual function with corresponding structural concomitants. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available