4.4 Article

Obesity and Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's Esophagus: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju252

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA136725, P30 DK034987, NIDDK 02956]
  2. European Association for Cancer Research
  3. University of Queensland
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  5. Alan B. Brown Chair in Molecular Genomics
  6. CCO Chair in Experimental Therapeutics Study
  7. CCO Chair in Population Study
  8. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program
  9. Fraternal Order of the Eagles
  10. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Award
  11. Swedish Ministry of Higher Education
  12. National Institutes of Health Career Development Award [K05CA124911]
  13. Australian Research Council [FT0990987]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Data from observational studies suggest that body mass index (BMI) is causally related to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and its precursor, Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, the relationships may be affected by bias and confounding. Methods We used data from the Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Genetic Susceptibility Study: 999 patients with EAC, 2061 patients with BE, and 2169 population controls. We applied the two-stage control function instrumental variable method of the Mendelian randomization approach to estimate the unbiased, unconfounded effect of BMI on risk of EAC and BE. This was performed using a genetic risk score, derived from 29 genetic variants shown to be associated with BMI, as an instrument for lifetime BMI. A higher score indicates propensity to obesity. All tests were two-sided. Results The genetic risk score was not associated with potential confounders, including gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and smoking. In the instrumental variable analyses (IV), EAC risk increased by 16% (IV-odds ratio [OR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.33) and BE risk increased by 12% (IV-OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.25) per 1 kg/m(2) increase in BMI. BMI was statistically significantly associated with EAC and BE in conventional epidemiologic analyses. Conclusions People with a high genetic propensity to obesity have higher risks of esophageal metaplasia and neoplasia than people with low genetic propensity. These analyses provide the strongest evidence to date that obesity is independently associated with BE and EAC, and is not due to confounding or bias inherent in conventional epidemiologic analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available