4.4 Article

Role of Type II Pneumocyte Senescence in Radiation-Induced Lung Fibrosis

Journal

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Volume 105, Issue 19, Pages 1474-1484

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt212

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Radiation is a commonly delivered therapeutic modality for cancer. The causes underlying the chronic, progressive nature of radiation injury in the lung are poorly understood. Methods C57Bl/6NCr mice were exposed to thoracic irradiation (n = 3 per dose and time point for tissue collection). Microarray analysis of gene expression from irradiated murine lung was performed using one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Scheffe analysis. Senescence and type II airway epithelial cell (AECII) count were assayed in irradiated murine lung tissue (n = 3 per condition). Irradiated mice were treated with diphenyleneiodonium (DPI), an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase (NOX), and fibrosis was assessed by collagen assays. All statistical tests were two-tailed. Results Gene expression in lung tissue from mice irradiated to 17.5 Gy clustered with that of aged unirradiated mice. Only fibrogenic exposures led to AECII senescence (0 Gy: 0.66% +/- 0.67%; 5 Gy: 4.5% +/- 1.19%; 17.5 Gy: 18.7% +/- 3.05; P = .007) and depletion (0 Gy: 2.89 per alveolus +/- 0.26; 5 Gy: 2.41 +/- 0.19; 17.5 Gy: 1.6 +/- 0.14; P < .001) at 30 weeks. Treatment of irradiated mice with DPI for 16 weeks markedly reduced collagen accumulation (5 x 6 Gy: 57.26 mu g/lung +/- 9.91; 5 x 6 Gy +/- DPI: 36.54 mu g/lung +/- 4.39; P = .03) and AECII senescence (5 x 6 Gy: 37.61% +/- 4.82%; 5 x 6 Gy +/- DPI: 12.38% +/- 2.78; P < .001). Conclusions These studies identify senescence as an important process in AECII in vivo and indicate that NOX is a critical mediator of radiation-induced AECII senescence and pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available