4.4 Article

Octreotide Acetate in Prevention of Chemoradiation-Induced Diarrhea in Anorectal Cancer: Randomized RTOG Trial 0315

Journal

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages 547-556

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq063

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [RTOG U10 CA21661, CCOP U10 CA37422, Stat U10 CA32115]
  2. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In anorectal cancer patients, an acute side effect of chemoradiotherapy is gastrointestinal toxicity, which often impedes treatment delivery. Based on previous trials, octreotide acetate is widely recommended for the control of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. However, the effectiveness of octreotide in preventing or controlling radiationand chemoradiation-induced diarrhea is not known. Methods A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was designed to determine the efficacy of long-acting octreotide acetate (LAO) in preventing the onset of acute diarrhea in patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy for rectal or anal cancer. Between 4 and 7 days before the start of radiation therapy, patients received a 30-mg dose of LAO (109 patients) or placebo (106 patients) via intramuscular injection. A second dose was given on day 22 (+/- 3 days) of radiation treatment. A total of 215 patients were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2-4 acute diarrhea; secondary endpoints included treatment compliance, medical resource utilization, patient-reported bowel function, and quality of life (QoL). Statistical tests were one-or two-sided, as specified. Results After a median follow-up time of 9.64 months, incidence rates of grades 2-4 acute diarrhea were similar in both groups (49% placebo vs 44% LAO; P=.21). No statistically significant treatment differences in chemotherapy or radiation delivery, medical resource utilization, patient-reported bowel function, or QoL were observed. Conclusion In this study, the prophylactic use of LAO did not prevent the incidence or reduce the severity of diarrhea and had no notable impact on patient-reported bowel function or QoL. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 547-556

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available