4.4 Article

Conjugated equine estrogen and risk of benign proliferative breast disease: A randomized controlled trial

Journal

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages 563-571

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn075

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA077290-07] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Estrogens stimulate proliferation of breast epithelium and may therefore increase the risk of benign proliferative breast disease, a condition that is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. We tested the effect of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) on risk of benign proliferative breast disease in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized controlled trial. Methods In the WHI CEE trial, 10739 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to 0.625 mg/d of CEE or to placebo. Baseline and annual breast examinations and mammograms were required. We identified women in the trial who reported breast biopsies that were free of cancer, obtained the associated histological sections, and subjected them to standardized central review. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results A total of 232 incident cases of benign proliferative breast disease were ascertained during follow-up (average duration, 6.9 years), with 155 in the CEE group and 77 in the placebo group. Use of CEE was associated with a more than two-fold increase in the risk of benign proliferative breast disease (HR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.58 to 2.81). For benign proliferative breast disease without atypia, the HR was 2.34 (95% CI = 1.71 to 3.20), whereas for atypical hyperplasia, it was 1.12 (95% CI = 0.53 to 2.40). Risk varied little by levels of baseline characteristics. Conclusion Use of 0.625 mg/d of CEE was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of benign proliferative breast disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available