4.7 Article

Strain-rate and temperature dependence of yield stress of amorphous solids via a self-learning metabasin escape algorithm

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 239-250

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.04.004

Keywords

Amorphous solid; Yield stress; Strain rate; Self-learning metabasin escape algorithm; Potential energy surface

Funding

  1. NSF [CMMI-1234183]
  2. NSF-XSEDE [DMR-0900073]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1234183] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A general self-learning metabasin escape (SLME) algorithm (Cao et al., 2012) is coupled in this work with continuous shear deformations to probe the yield stress as a function of strain rate and temperature for a binary Lennard-Jones (LJ) amorphous solid. The approach is shown to match the results of classical molecular dynamics (MD) at high strain rates where the MD results are valid, but, importantly, is able to access experimental strain rates that are about ten orders of magnitude slower than MD. In doing so, we find in agreement with previous experimental studies that a substantial decrease in yield stress is observed with a decreasing strain rate. At room temperature and laboratory strain rates, the activation volume associated with yield is found to contain about 10 LJ particles, while the yield stress is as sensitive to a 1.5%T-g increase in temperature as it is to a one order of magnitude decrease in the strain rate. Moreover, our SLME results suggest that the SLME and extrapolated results from MD simulations follow distinctly different energetic pathways during the applied shear deformation at low temperatures and experimental strain rates, which implies that extrapolation of the governing deformation mechanisms from MD strain rates to experimental may not be valid. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available