4.7 Article

Adiabatic decohesion in a thermoplastic craze thickening at constant or increasing rate

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 2149-2170

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.02.001

Keywords

crack propagation and arrest; dynamic fracture; fracture mechanisms; fracture toughness; polymeric material

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When a crack in a thermally non-diffusive material is impact loaded-or propagates at high speed-a cohesive process which resists slow crack extension may itself cause decohesion by adiabatic heating. By assuming that decohesion ultimately occurs by low-energy disentanglement within a melt layer of critical thickness, the fracture resistance of craze-forming crystalline polymers can be estimated quantitatively. Previous estimates used a simple, thermomechanically linear representation of craze fibril drawing. This paper presents a more physically realistic, numerical formulation, and demonstrates it for constant craze thickening rate (as imposed by an ideal full-notch tension test) and for linearly increasing thickening rate (as at the tip of an impact-loaded or rapidly propagating crack). For a linear material, the numerical formulation gives results which asymptotically approach those from analytical solutions, as craze density approaches zero. In more realistic model polymers, the enthalpy of fusion increasingly delays decohesion as impact speed increases, although the temperature distribution of an endotherm appears to have little effect. Increasing molecular weight, heuristically associated with decreasing craze density and increasing structural dimension, increases the predicted impact fracture resistance. In every case, fracture resistance passes through a minimum as impact speed increases. The conclusions encourage the use of impact fracture tests, and discourage the use of the full-notch tension test, to assess the dynamic fracture resistance of a craze-forming polymer. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available