4.6 Article

Characterization of the anisotropic mechanical properties of excised human skin

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.016

Keywords

Soft tissue; Langer lines; Tensile properties; Histology

Funding

  1. European Community
  2. IRCSET (Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology)
  3. Office of the State Pathologist (Irish Department of Justice and Law Reform)
  4. Ile-de-France Region

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanical properties of skin are important for a number of applications including surgery, dermatology, impact biomechanics and forensic science. In this study, we have investigated the influence of location and orientation on the deformation characteristics of 56 samples of excised human skin. Uniaxial tensile tests were carried out at a strain rate of 0.012 s(-1) on skin from the back. Digital Image Correlation was used for 2D strain measurement and a histological examination of the dermis was also performed. The mean ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was 21.6 +/- 8.4 MPa, the mean failure strain 54% +/- 17%, the mean initial slope 1.18 +/- 0.88 MPa, the mean elastic modulus 83.3 +/- 34.9 MPa and the mean strain energy was 3.6 +/- 1.6 MJ/m(3). A multivariate analysis of variance has shown that these mechanical properties of skin are dependent upon the orientation of the Langer lines (P < 0.0001 - P = 0.046). The location of specimens on the back was also found to have a significant effect on the UTS (P = 0.0002), the elastic modulus (P = 0.001) and the strain energy (P = 0.0052). The histological investigation concluded that there is a definite correlation between the orientation of the Langer lines and the preferred orientation of collagen fibres in the dermis (P < 0.001). The data obtained in this study will provide essential information for those wishing to model the skin using a structural constitutive model. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available