4.6 Article

Fabrication and characterization of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) knitted mesh-reinforced collagen-chitosan hybrid scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.001

Keywords

Knitted mesh; Microstructure; Angiogenesis; Tissue regeneration; Mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanical properties are essential considerations for the design of porous scaffolds in the field of tissue engineering. To develop a well-supported hybrid dermal substitute, poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) yarns were knitted into a mesh with relative fixed loops, followed by incorporation into collagen-chitosan scaffolds (CCS) to obtain PLGA knitted mesh-reinforced CCS (PLGAm/CCS). The morphology and tensile strength in both the dry and wet state of PLGAm/CCS were investigated in vitro. To characterize the tissue response, specifically angiogenesis and tissue regeneration, PLGAm/CCS was embedded subcutaneously in Sprague-Dawley rats and compared with two control implants, i.e., PLGA mesh (PLGAm) and CCS. At weeks 1, 2, and 4 post surgery, tissue specimens were harvested for histology, immunohistochemistry, real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot analysis. These results demonstrated that the incorporation of PLGA knitted mesh into CCS can improve the mechanical strength with little influence on its mean pore size and porosity. After implantation, PLGAm/CCS can resist contraction and promote cell infiltration, neotissue formation, and blood vessel ingrowth, effectively. In conclusion, the mechanical strength of scaffolds can play a synergetic role in tissue regeneration and vascularization by maintaining its 3D microstructure. The ability of PLGAm/CCS to promote angiogenesis and induce in situ tissue formation demonstrates its strong potential in the field of skin tissue engineering. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available