4.7 Article

Thermal degradation mechanism of poly(hexamethylene carbonate)

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 70-77

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.12.013

Keywords

Poly(hexamethylene carbonate); Thermal degradation mechanism; Chain-end group; Intramolecular transesterification reaction; beta-H transfer reaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21304100, 51373186]
  2. Cultivation Project of Institute of Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences [CMS-PY-201330]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermal degradation behaviors of poly(hexamethylene carbonate) (PHC) were investigated by means of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 NMR), gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). Six types of PHC samples with different end groups and molecular weights were synthesized to systematically investigate the thermal degradation mechanism. Thermal degradation behaviors of the PHC samples were examined under both isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. The PHC samples showed distinct thermal degradation behaviors from other aliphatic polycarbonates (poly(propylene carbonate), poly(trimethylene carbonate) and poly(butylene carbonate)). The results indicated that the chain-end structure makes a slight effect on the thermal stability of PHC regardless of the molecular weight. During the non-isothermal degradation of PHC, four main reactions were illustrated: unzipping, intramolecular transesterification, beta-H transfer and decarboxylation reactions. Intramolecular transesterification reaction dominantly occurs below 300 degrees C accompanying with unzipping reaction which can only be induced by hydroxyl end group, and releasing cyclic hexamethylene carbonate monomer and dimer. Above 300 degrees C, the four degradation reactions take place simultaneously. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available