4.7 Article

The applicability of Impranil®DLN for gauging the biodegradation of polyurethanes

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 178-185

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.06.020

Keywords

Biodegradation; Polyurethane; Hydrolase; NMR; IR; Colloid

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [12RX14COR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyurethane-based polymers and their eventual degradation products pervade modern society. One common method for determining whether a microorganism or protein can degrade this class of polymer is to qualitatively assess its ability to clear a polyester-polyurethane colloid branded Impranil (R) DLN (Impranil), whose formulation is proprietary. However, its colloidal state has ultimately made Impranil a precarious choice for determining if an organism or enzyme can degrade polyurethanes. In this work, the chemical hydrolysis products from Impranil using 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH were identified and compared to the concentration of hydrolysis products formed using three commercial enzymes by proton nuclear magnetic spectroscopy (H-1 NMR) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The differences in the integrated signal intensities from key H-1 NMR signals were used to calculate the amount of Impranil that was hydrolyzed. These data were then correlated with the change in optical density of colloid containing reaction mixtures (termed as clearing). The enzymes (a Pseudomonas fluorescens recombinant esterase, Pseudomonas sp. lipase, and Bacillus sp. protease) showed significant esterase activities and partially-cleared, completely-cleared, or aggregated Impranil, respectively. However, only the Pseudomonas sp. lipase significantly degraded Impranil based on NMR and IR data. This study illustrates how Impranil can be used to quantitatively assess biodegradation rather than just be a qualitative clearing indicator of biodegradation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available