4.3 Review

Stem cells and kidney regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 201-209

Publisher

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.12.001

Keywords

bioengineered kidney; endothelial progenitor cell; kidney regeneration; renal progenitor cell; stem cell

Funding

  1. National Science Council [101-2321-B-002-060, 101-2314-B-002-084, 102-2321-B002045, 102-2314-B-002-113, 102-2628-B002-015]
  2. National Taiwan University Hospital [102-S2042, YL102-N010]
  3. Mrs. Hsiu-Chin Lee Kidney Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kidney disease is an escalating burden all over the world. In addition to preventing kidney injury, regenerating damaged renal tissue is as important as to retard the progression of chronic kidney disease to end stage renal disease. Although the kidney is a delicate organ and has only limited regenerative capacity compared to the other organs, an increasing understanding of renal development and renal reprogramming has kindled the prospects of regenerative options for kidney disease. Here, we will review the advances in the kidney regeneration including the manipulation of renal tubular cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and macrophages in renal disease. Several types of stem cells, such as bone marrow-derived cells, adipocyte-derived mesenchymal stem cells, embryonic stem cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells are also applied for renal regeneration. Endogenous or lineage reprogrammed renal progenitor cells represent an attractive possibility for differentiation into multiple renal cell types. Angiogenesis can ameliorate hypoxia and renal fibrosis. Based on these studies and knowledge, we hope to innovate more reliable pharmacological or biotechnical methods for kidney regeneration medicine. Copyright (C) 2014, Elsevier Taiwan LLC a Formosan Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available