4.2 Article

A MECHANISM FOR REDUCING DELAY DISCOUNTING BY ALTERING TEMPORAL ATTENTION

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages 363-385

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-363

Keywords

delay discounting; hidden-zero effect; temporal attention; reward sequences; priming; humans

Funding

  1. John Philip Coghlan Fellowship
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01DA024080, R01DA022386, 1UL1RR029884, R01 DA011692-11]
  3. Wilbur Mills Chair Endowment
  4. Arkansas Biosciences Institute
  5. National Institute of Health [R01MH76074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rewards that are not immediately available are discounted compared to rewards that are immediately available. The more a person discounts a delayed reward, the more likely that person is to have a range of behavioral problems, including clinical disorders. This latter observation has motivated the search for interventions that reduce discounting. One surprisingly simple method to reduce discounting is an explicit-zero reframing that states default or null outcomes. Reframing a classical discounting choice as something now but nothing later versus nothing now but more later decreases discount rates. However, it is not clear how this explicit-zero framing intervention works. The present studies delineate and test two possible mechanisms to explain the phenomenon. One mechanism proposes that the explicit-zero framing creates the impression of an improving sequence, thereby enhancing the present value of the delayed reward. A second possible mechanism posits an increase in attention allocation to temporally distant reward representations. In four experiments, we distinguish between these two hypothesized mechanisms and conclude that the temporal attention hypothesis is superior for explaining our results. We propose a model of temporal attention whereby framing affects intertemporal preferences by modifying present bias.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available