4.7 Article

Microstructural changes in (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 ceramics sintered in various atmospheres

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 2581-2588

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.02.006

Keywords

Grain growth; Microstructure-final; Interfaces; Niobates; Lead-free piezoelectric

Funding

  1. Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy [MOCIE], Republic of Korea [PM007-8-01-01]
  2. Korean Government [KRF-2005-005-J09701]
  3. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [PM007-8-01] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0094039] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

(K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 is a potential lead-free piezoelectric ceramic, but often suffers from abnormal grain growth. Previous work on BaTiO3 and SrTiO3 has shown that abnormal grain growth can be suppressed by controlling the sintering atmosphere. In the present work, (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 was sintered in atmospheres ranging from O-2 to H-2 and the effect on grain growth behaviour studied. Sintering in reducing atmospheres causes a delay in the onset and a reduction in the amount of abnormal grain growth. The effect of sintering atmosphere on grain growth behaviour can be explained using the 2D nucleation-controlled theory of grain growth. Changes in the grain shape during sintering in reducing atmospheres indicate a reduction in the edge free energy of (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 caused by an increase in the concentration of oxygen vacancies. This decreases the critical driving force necessary for rapid grain growth and causes a transition from abnormal to pseudo-normal followed by abnormal grain growth, (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available