4.6 Article

The Eczema Education Programme: intervention development and model feasibility

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12221

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Guy's & St Thomas' Charity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe systematic support of parents of children with eczema is essential to their effective management; however, we have few models of support. This study examines the rationale, evidence base and development of a large-scale, structured, theory-based, nurse-led intervention, the Eczema Education Programme' (EEP), for parents of children with eczema. ObjectivesTo outline development of the EEP, model of delivery, determine its feasibility and evaluate this based on service access and parental satisfaction data. MethodsParent-child dyads meeting EEP referral criteria were recruited and demographic information recorded. A questionnaire survey of parental satisfaction was conducted 4weeks post EEP; parental focus groups at 6weeks provided comparative qualitative data. Descriptive statistics were derived from the questionnaire data using Predictive Analytics Software (PASW); content analysis was applied to focus group data. ResultsA total of 356 parents attended the EEP during the evaluation period. Service access was achieved for those in a challenging population. Both survey data (n=146 parents, 57%) and focus group data (n=21) revealed a significant level of parental satisfaction with the programme. ConclusionsIt was feasible to provide the EEP as an adjunct to normal clinical care on a large scale, achieving a high level of patient/parent satisfaction and access within an urban area of multiple deprivation and high mobility. The intervention is transferable and the results are generalizable to other ethnically diverse child eczema populations within metropolitan areas in Britain. A multicentre RCT is required to test the effectiveness of this intervention on a larger scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available