4.6 Article

Influence of Lithium Iron Phosphate Positive Electrode Material to Hybrid Lithium-Ion Battery Capacitor (H-LIBC) Energy Storage Devices

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 165, Issue 11, Pages A2774-A2780

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0911811jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-15-2-R-0011-03]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2650]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-ion capacitor (LIC) is known as a huge step after lithium-ion battery (LIB) and ultracapacitor by combining both pre-lithated graphite/hard carbon negative electrode (NE) and activated carbon positive electrode (PE) in its design. And LIC can realize high energy and power densities as well as fast charging property with extreme long cycling life. In this paper, a new cell design based energy storage device named hybrid lithium-ion battery capacitor (H-LIBC) will be reported. By adding different amount of lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4, LFP) in LIC 's PE material activated carbon, H-LIBC will show various amount of battery properties when comparing with standard LIC. That is to say, LFP can actually improve LIC's battery side and leaves more energy storage space. In addition, the remaining LIC materials can still maintain its fast charging property and long cycle life. In this paper, electrode will be examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) as well as energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyzer. Later, 3-electrode cells will be used to demonstrate LFP's influence on standard LIC and they will be fabricated after electrode manufacturing. In the meantime, a new calculation method to determine the amount of pre-loaded ultra-thin lithium to the NE will be illustrated. Furthermore, nine-layer laminated hybrid cells will be compared with same size 200F standard LIC to see the capacitance and energy density change. High rate cycle life results are also included. (C) 2018 The Electrochemical Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available