4.6 Article

Influence of Cell-to-Cell Variations on the Inhomogeneity of Lithium-Ion Battery Modules

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 165, Issue 11, Pages A2587-A2607

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0111811jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bavarian Ministry of Economy, Media, Energy and Technology under the EEBatt
  2. SPICY project - European Union's Horizon 2020 Program (H2020) [653373]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhomogeneity within lithium-ion battery modules can occur due to variations in capacity and impedance of the connected cells as well as due to thermal gradients or cell connector design. We present a model for describing xSyP battery modules during operation, which is able to study these effects. The multidimensional multiphysics model includes a physicochemical model describing the electrochemical behavior of each cell. The electrical model accounts for the conservation of electric charge and energy between the cells to reach electrical consistency according to the respective module topology and cell interconnections. The model is capable of investigating the influence of defective and asymmetric cell connectors on the inhomogeneity of module operation. To evaluate this electrical influence, the observed inhomogeneities are compared to the influence of thermal gradients between the cells. The resulting inhomogeneous current distribution is presented for a module of two parallel connected lithium iron phosphate-graphite cells under constant current discharge operation for variations in cell capacity, cell impedance and ambient temperature at different module contact scenarios. From the observed impact of both, electrical and thermal variations between parallel connected cells, a matching strategy is derived and discussed which can enhance a module's performance during e.g. second life applications. (C) The Author(s) 2018. Published by ECS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available