4.6 Article

Dynamic Stress Analysis Applied to (111)-Textured Pt in HClO4 Electrolyte

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 160, Issue 9, Pages H636-H643

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.003310jes

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic stress analysis (DSA) was performed on Pt cantilever electrodes immersed in 0.1 mol/L HClO4 electrolyte. DSA combines elements of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cantilever curvature. In this paper DSA is used to determine the relationship between surface stress f and charge density q for (111)-textured Pt as a function of steady state potential. The parameter of merit is the stress-charge coefficient, xi, a complex number, which is obtained from the product of the electrochemical impedance Z(e) and the stress admittance Y-s. The magnitude and sign of xi(r), the real component of xi, quantifies how the surface responds to changes in charge density. Three regions of stress-charge behavior have been identified at potentials bound by hydrogen adsorption and platinum oxide formation. In the hydrogen adsorption region, stress and charge are in phase, resulting in a positive value of xi(r). In the double layer region the surface stress and the charge density are 180 degrees out of phase, yielding a negative value of xi(r). The actual potential at which this phase angle transition occurs may vary by as much as 0.3 V, depending on electrode history. At more positive potential xi(r) remains negative in the early oxide region, where the reversible adsorption of 0 occurs. Only at more positive potential, where place exchange between Pt and 0 occurs and the surface layer of PtO becomes fully formed, does xi(r) transition back to a positive value. The experimental methods described in this work provide a means to probe the dynamic behavior of surface stress. (C) 2013 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available