4.6 Article

Gadolinium-Doped LiMn2O4 Cathodes in Li Ion Batteries: Understanding the Stabilized Structure and Enhanced Electrochemical Kinetics

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 159, Issue 11, Pages A1867-A1873

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.009212jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. WCU program through the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R31-10022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gadolinium-doped LiGdxMn2-xO4 was synthesized by a sol-gel method and applied as cathode material in Li ion batteries. Gd-doping significantly changed the unit cell parameter and atomic arrangement. With an increase of x, a cell dimension contracts from 8.2419(2) to 8.2375(8) (x = 0.02), 8.2295(3) (x = 0.04), and 8.2120(6) angstrom (x = 0.08), with concomitant changes in bond length. The LiO4 tetrahedron expands to facilitate a fast electrochemical process and the MnO6 octahedron shrinks to provide structural integrity. The former contributes to a better high-rate performance and the latter leads to a variation in the cell dimensions during charge-discharge cycles that is less than that found in LiMn2O4 (structure-stabilization). The strong octahedral framework eventually results in minimized contraction of the unit cell after repeated cycles and in good capacity retention. A less capacity fading of LiGd0.02Mn2.98O4 can be correlated to a smaller dimensional variation between charged and discharged states (LiMn2O4: 8.1366 and 8.0460 angstrom (two phases, charged) and 8.2419 angstrom (discharged) vs. LiGd0.02Mn2.98O4: 8.1472 angstrom (single phase, charged) to 8.2375 angstrom (discharged)) and, thus, the less unit cell contraction for LiGd0.02Mn2.98O4 after repeated cycling (LiMn2O4: 8.2419 angstrom to 8.218 angstrom vs. LiGd0.02Mn2.98O4: 8.2375 angstrom to 8.229 angstrom). (C) 2012 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/2.009212jes] All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available