4.6 Article

Oxygen Permeation in Thin, Dense Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95-delta Membranes II. Experimental Determination

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 158, Issue 5, Pages F73-F83

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1.3559189

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research, Programme Commission on Sustainable Energy and Environment [2104-0450041]
  2. Denmark's Technical University (DTU)
  3. University of Copenhagen
  4. Capital Region of Denmark
  5. Statens Serum Institut

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thin (similar to 30 mu m), dense Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95-delta (CGO10) membranes (5 x 5 cm(2)) supported on a porous NiO/YSZ substrate were fabricated by tape casting, wet powder spraying and lamination. A La0.58Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta/Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95-delta (LSCF/CGO10) composite cathode was applied by screen printing. Oxygen permeation measurements and electrochemical characterisation of the cells were performed as a function of temperature with air and varying hydrogen/steam mixtures flowing in the feed and permeate compartments, respectively. The oxygen flux was found to reach 10 N mL min(-1) cm(-2) at similar to 1100 K and to exceed 16 N mL min(-1) cm(-2) at 1175 K. The measured oxygen flux was in good agreement with theoretical predictions from a model that takes into account the bulk transport properties of Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95-delta, the anode and cathode polarisation resistances, and the gas conversion and gas diffusion losses in the permeate compartment. The performance of the membrane was also investigated under varying CH4 and H2O gas mixtures at 1106 K. The oxygen flux increased with decreasing steam to carbon ratio and was found to exceed 10 N mL min(-1) cm(-2) of O-2 for steam to carbon ratios below 4:3. Post-test analysis of the tested membrane did not reveal any significant microstructural degradation of the CGO10 membrane or the anode-support. (C) 2011 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/1.3559189] All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available