4.6 Article

Condensation in PEM Fuel Cell Gas Diffusion Layers: A Pore Network Modeling Approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 157, Issue 10, Pages B1382-B1390

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1.3467837

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Bullitt Foundation
  3. University of Toronto
  4. Bert Wasmund Graduate Fellowship in Sustainable Energy Research
  5. Pierre Rivard Hydrogenics Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A two-dimensional dynamic pore network model is developed and employed to simulate the through-plane transport of liquid water originating from condensation in hydrophobic gas diffusion layers (GDLs) for polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells. The model tracks viscous and capillary forces over a range of specified condensation rates and nucleation positions. A simplified mass transport assumption of a uniform water vapor flux between the cathode catalyst layer and the liquid water cluster allows for a computationally inexpensive model. Stochastically generated steady-state saturation profiles are compared to investigate the effects of nucleation position, channel rib presence, coalescence assumptions, and condensation rates on liquid water distribution. Results indicate that GDL saturation conditions become increasingly more desirable as nucleation sites are placed further away from the catalyst layer, and saturation profiles are significantly higher when nucleation is adjacent to a hydrophobic rib compared to the gas channel or a hydrophilic rib. Meanwhile, the trapping assumption that affects liquid water coalescence in small throats has little impact on saturation patterns but has a large impact on the system's viscous forces. Finally, the model can predict the limiting water cluster growth rates of capillary dominated growth for a given pore network. (C) 2010 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/1.3467837] All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available