4.6 Article

The Role of Coherency Strains on Phase Stability in LixFePO4: Needle Crystallites Minimize Coherency Strain and Overpotential

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 156, Issue 11, Pages A949-A957

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1.3222746

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. General Motors
  2. Department of Energy Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the role of coherency strains on the thermodynamics of two-phase coexistence during Li (de) intercalation of LixFePO4. We explicitly account for the anisotropy of the elastic moduli and analytically derive coupled chemical and mechanical equilibrium criteria for two-phase morphologies observed experimentally. Coherent two-phase equilibrium leads to a variable voltage profile of individual crystallites within the two-phase region as the dimensions of the crystallite parallel to the interface depend on the phase fractions of the coexisting phases. With a model free energy for LixFePO4, we illustrate the effect of coherency strains on the compositions of the coexisting phases and on the voltage profile. We also show how coherency strains can stabilize intermediate solid solutions at low temperatures if phase separation is restricted to Li diffusion along the b-axis of olivine LixFePO4. A finite element analysis shows that long needlelike crystallites with the long axis parallel to the a lattice vector of LixFePO4 minimize coherency strain energy. Hence, needlelike crystallites of LiFePO4 reduce the overpotential needed for Li insertion and removal and minimize mechanical damage, such as dislocation nucleation and crack formation, resulting from large coherency strain energies. (C) 2009 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/1.3222746] All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available