4.4 Article

Persistent exudative retinal detachment after photodynamic therapy and intravitreal bevacizumab injection for multiple retinal capillary hemangiomas in a patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 52-56

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2013.09.001

Keywords

exudative retinal detachment; photodynamic therapy; retinal capillary hemangioma; von Hippel-Lindau

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been used in treating peripheral retinal capillary hemangioma (RCH) with satisfactory results. We report a rare case of von Hippel-Lindau (VEIL) disease with three large peripheral RCHs, treated with PDT and intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB), who developed persistent bullous exudative retinal detachment (RD) despite significant tumor regression. The patient is a sporadic case of VHL disease, with a de novo nonsense mutation in codon 161 with C -> T transition at nucleotide position 694 of the VHL gene. Multiple RCHs were noted in both eyes. Four small RCHs were found in the left eye and were treated with laser photocoagulation. Three large RCHs in the peripheral retina of the right eye were complicated with cystoid macular edema and subretinal fluid accumulation. The RCHs were treated with PDT combined with IVB, and bullous exudative RD developed on the second day after treatment. Three months after PDT, the tumors had regressed significantly, but exudative RD persisted, despite multiple IVB and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection (IVTA). External drainage with sclera buckling, IVB, and IVTA were performed, and the retina attached after surgical intervention. The application of PDT in the treatment of RCHs and its possible complications are discussed. Copyright (C) 2013 Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available