4.0 Article

A Green Analytical Procedure for Determination of Copper and Iron in Plant Materials after Cloud Point Extraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 234-239

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0103-50532010000200007

Keywords

green analytical chemistry; cloud point extraction; FAAS; spectrophotometry; plant materials; copper; iron

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A green analytical procedure exploiting cloud point extraction for determination of copper and iron in plant materials is presented. After sample digestion with a diluted oxidant mixture (HNO3 + H2O2) in a closed vessel microwave oven, metal ions were simultaneously extracted as hydrophobic complexes formed with 1,2-tiazolylazo-2-naphthol (TAN) using Triton X-114 as extracting agent. Copper and iron were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) and iron also by UV-Vis spectrophotometry. For FAAS, the detection limits (99.7% confidence level) were estimated as 1 and 10 mu g L-1 for copper and iron, respectively. Linear responses for both analytes were observed in the 25-200 mu g L-1 range. The enrichment factors were estimated as 30 for both analytes and the extraction was quantitative, as evaluated by measurements in the supernatant solution remaining after extraction. For iron determination by UV-Vis spectrophotometry, the detection limit was estimated as 1 mg L-1, with linear response within 6 and 60 mg L-1. The accuracy of the procedure was evaluated by determination of the metals in certified reference materials and the results agreed with the certified values at the 95% confidence level. In the whole procedure, the reagent consumption was 1 mL HNO3, 1.1 mL H2O2, 50 mg Triton X-114 and 150 mu g TAN per determination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available