4.3 Article

LAND USE AND CLIMATE VARIABILITY AMPLIFY CARBON, NUTRIENT, AND CONTAMINANT PULSES: A REVIEW WITH MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12204

Keywords

eutrophication; water quality; hypoxia; nonpoint source pollution; methane; nitrous oxide; carbon dioxide; restoration; wetlands; best management practices

Funding

  1. NASA [NASA NNX11AM28G]
  2. Maryland Sea Grant [SA7528085-U, R/WS-2, NA05OAR4171042]
  3. USGS [IWRRC 06HQGR0084 (104B), USGS-NIWR 08HQGR0052 (104 G)]
  4. EPA NNEMS [2010-308]
  5. Indiana University-Purdue University
  6. Indianapolis RSGF
  7. Mirsky Fellowship
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology [1027188] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  11. Directorate For Engineering [1058502] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonpoint source pollution from agriculture and urbanization is increasing globally at the same time climate extremes have increased in frequency and intensity. We review > 200 studies of hydrologic and gaseous fluxes and show how the interaction between land use and climate variability alters magnitude and frequency of carbon, nutrient, and greenhouse gas pulses in watersheds. Agricultural and urban watersheds respond similarly to climate variability due to headwater alteration and loss of ecosystem services to buffer runoff and temperature changes. Organic carbon concentrations/exports increase and organic carbon quality changes with runoff. Nitrogen and phosphorus exports increase during floods (sometimes by an order of magnitude) and decrease during droughts. Relationships between annual runoff and nitrogen and phosphorus exports differ across land use. CH4 and N2O pulses in riparian zones/floodplains predominantly increase with: flooding, warming, low oxygen, nutrient enrichment, and organic carbon. CH4, N2O, and CO2 pulses in streams/rivers increase due to similar factors but effects of floods are less known compared to base flow/droughts. Emerging questions include: (1) What factors influence lag times of contaminant pulses in response to extreme events? (2) What drives resistance/resilience to hydrologic and gaseous pulses? We conclude with eight recommendations for managing watershed pulses in response to interactive effects of land use and climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available