4.3 Article

FIELD APPLICATION OF A RENEWABLE CONSTRUCTED WETLAND SUBSTRATE FOR PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00557.x

Keywords

best management practices; environmental impacts; phosphorus; stormwater management; sustainability; constructed wetland substrates

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0649079]
  2. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers
  3. Directorate For Engineering [0649079] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphorus (P) is typically the best target to prevent eutrophication in freshwater, a biological process associated with water quality degradation. Constructed wetlands (CW) and other practices that include P removal by sorption processes in substrates can provide economical treatment of stormwater, but have limitations (e. g., large land requirements, loss of removal over time, lack of P recovery). Over the last three years, a multi-study research program addressed these limitations with a new P management concept. This concept minimizes CW size with a rejuvenation cycle (or rejuvenation) that renews P-sorption capacity in the CW substrates and enables P recovery for productive use. This study, conducted in Blacksburg, Virginia (July-September 2009), tested the efficacy of rejuvenation in the field. Methods included replicate cells of two sand substrates monitored for P removal during prerejuvenation and postrejuvenation filtration runs. One substrate contained cast iron filings as a repository for sorption capacity. Results support the following conclusions: (1) P removal is likely dependent on multiple factors including influent P concentration, previous substrate /solution equilibrium, pH, and time; (2) rejuvenation is capable of releasing P adsorbed during stormwater filtration; (3) inclusion of cast iron in substrate promotes additional P removal and enables further removal after rejuvenation; but (4) inclusion of cast iron may limit release of P during rejuvenation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available