4.3 Article

SIMULATION OF COMBINED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00462.x

Keywords

runoff; streamflow; simulation; Best Management Practices; stormwater management; sustainability; watershed management; Low Impact Development

Funding

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency [SU833944]
  2. Texas A&M University Utilities, College Station
  3. EPA [SU833944, 150602] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urbanization causes increased stormwater runoff volumes, leading to erosion, flooding, and the degradation of instream ecosystem health. Although Best Management Practices (BMPs) are used widely as a means for controlling flood runoff events, Low Impact Development (LID) options have been proposed as an alternative approach to better mimic the natural flow regime by using decentralized designs to control stormwater runoff at the source, rather than at a centralized location in the watershed. For highly urbanized areas, LID practices such as rainwater harvesting, green roofs, and permeable pavements can be used to retrofit existing infrastructure and reduce runoff volumes and peak flows. This paper describes a modeling approach to incorporate these LID practices in an existing hydrologic model to estimate the effects of LID choices on streamflow. The modeling approach has been applied to a watershed located on the campus of Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas, to predict the stormwater reductions resulting from retrofitting existing infrastructure with LID technologies. Results demonstrate that use of these LID practices yield significant stormwater control for small events and less control for flood events. A combined BMP-LID approach is tested for runoff control for both flood and frequent rainfall events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available