4.6 Article

An Integrative Bayesian Modeling Approach to Imaging Genetics

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 108, Issue 503, Pages 876-891

Publisher

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.804409

Keywords

Bayesian hierarchical model; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Markov random field; Neuroimaging; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Variable selection

Funding

  1. NIH/NELBI [P01-HL082798]
  2. NSF/DMS [1007871]
  3. NIH [R01EB005846, 5P20RR021938]
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1007871] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article we present a Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach for imaging genetics, where the interest lies in linking brain connectivity across multiple individuals to their genetic information. We have available data from a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study on schizophrenia. Our goals are to identify brain regions of interest (ROIs) with discriminating activation patterns between schizophrenic patients and healthy controls, and to relate the ROIs' activations with available genetic information from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the subjects. For this task, we develop a hierarchical mixture model that includes several innovative characteristics: it incorporates the selection of ROIs that discriminate the subjects into separate groups; it allows the mixture components to depend on selected covariates; it includes prior models that capture structural dependencies among the ROIs. Applied to the schizophrenia dataset, the model leads to the simultaneous selection of a set of discriminatory ROIs and the relevant SNPs, together with the reconstruction of the correlation structure of the selected regions. To the best of our knowledge, our work represents the first attempt at a rigorous modeling strategy for imaging genetics data that incorporates all such features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available