4.6 Article

Sparse Estimation of Conditional Graphical Models With Application to Gene Networks

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 107, Issue 497, Pages 152-167

Publisher

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2011.644498

Keywords

Conditional random field; Gaussian graphical models; Lasso and adaptive lasso; Oracle property; Reproducing kernel Hilbert space; Sparsity; Sparsistency; von Mises expansion

Funding

  1. NSF [DMS-0704621, DMS-0806058, DMS-1106815, DMS-1107025, DMS-0714817, DMS-1106738]
  2. NIH [R01 GM59507, P30 DA018343]
  3. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1106815, 1107025] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many applications the graph structure in a network arises from two sources: intrinsic connections and connections due to external effects. We introduce a sparse estimation procedure for graphical models that is capable of isolating the intrinsic connections by removing the external effects. Technically, this is formulated as a conditional graphical model, in which the external effects are modeled as predictors, and the graph is determined by the conditional precision matrix. We introduce two sparse estimators of this matrix using the reproduced kernel Hilbert space combined with lasso and adaptive lasso. We establish the sparsity, variable selection consistency, oracle property, and the asymptotic distributions of the proposed estimators. We also develop their convergence rate when the dimension of the conditional precision matrix goes to infinity. The methods are compared with sparse estimators for unconditional graphical models, and with the constrained maximum likelihood estimate that assumes a known graph structure. The methods are applied to a genetic data set to construct a gene network conditioning on single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available