4.6 Article

Improved Inference for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data With Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 106, Issue 493, Pages 135-146

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09475

Keywords

Hidden population sampling; Link-tracing; Markov chain; Network sampling; PPSWOR; Snowball sampling; Social networks; Successive sampling

Funding

  1. NICHD [1R21HD063000]
  2. NSF [MMS-0851555]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Respondent-driven sampling is a form of link-tracing network sampling, which is widely used to study hard-to-reach populations, often to estimate population proportions. Previous treatments of this process have used a with-replacement approximation, which we show induces bias in estimates for large sample fractions and differential network connectedness by characteristic of interest. We present a treatment of respondent-driven sampling as a successive sampling process. Unlike existing representations, our approach respects the essential without-replacement feature of the process, while converging to an existing with-replacement representation for small sample fractions, and to the sample mean for a full-population sample. We present a successive-sampling based estimator for population means based on respondent-driven sampling data, and demonstrate its super,or performance when the size of the hidden population is known. We present sensitivity analyses for unknown population sizes. In addition, we note that like other existing estimators, our new estimator is subject to bias induced by the selection of the initial sample. Using data collected among three populations in two countries, we illustrate the application of this approach to populations with varying characteristics. We conclude that the successive sampling estimator improves on existing estimators, and can also be used as a diagnostic tool when population size is not known. This article has supplementary material online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available