4.6 Article

Poisson Autoregression

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 104, Issue 488, Pages 1430-1439

Publisher

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08270

Keywords

phi irreducibility; Asymptotic theory; Count data; Generalized linear model; Geometric ergodicity; Integer generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity; Likelihood; Noncanonical link function; Observation-driven model; Poisson regression

Funding

  1. Danish Social Sciences Research Council [2114-04-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article we consider geometric ergodicity and likelihood-based inference for linear and nonlinear Poisson autoregression. In the linear case, the conditional mean is linked linearly to its past values, as well as to the observed values of the Poisson process. This also applies to the conditional variance, making possible interpretation as an integer-valued generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity process. In a nonlinear conditional Poisson model, the conditional mean is a nonlinear function of its past values and past observations. As a particular example, we consider an exponential autoregressive Poisson model for time series. Under geometric ergodicity, the maximum likelihood estimators are shown to be asymptotically Gaussian in the linear model. In addition, we provide a consistent estimator of their asymptotic covariance matrix. Our approach to verifying geometric ergodicity proceeds via Markov theory and irreducibility. Finding transparent conditions for proving ergodicity turns out to be a delicate problem in the original model formulation. This problem is circumvented by allowing a perturbation of the model. We show that as the perturbations can be chosen to be arbitrarily small, the differences between the perturbed and nonperturbed versions vanish as far as the asymptotic distribution of the parameter estimates is concerned. This article has supplementary material online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available