4.7 Article

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, Race, and Mortality in Young Adult Dialysis Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 2649-2657

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013111207

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute for Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases [T32-DK007732, K23-DK081317]
  2. Amos Medical Faculty Development Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Young blacks receiving dialysis have an increased risk of death compared with whites in the United States. Factors influencing this disparity among the young adult dialysis population have not been well explored. Our study examined the relation of neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and racial differences in mortality in United States young adults receiving dialysis. We merged US Renal Data System patient-level data from 11,027 black and white patients ages 18-30 years old initiating dialysis between 2006 and 2009 with US Census data to obtain neighborhood poverty information for each patient. We defined low SES neighborhoods as those neighborhoods in US Census zip codes with >= 20% of residents living below the federal poverty level and quantified race differences in mortality risk by level of neighborhood SES. Among patients residing in low SES neighborhoods, blacks had greater mortality than whites after adjusting for baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, rurality, and access to care factors. This difference in mortality between blacks and whites was significantly attenuated in higher SES neighborhoods. In the United States, survival between young adult blacks and whites receiving dialysis differs by neighborhood SES. Additional studies are needed to identify modifiable factors contributing to the greater mortality among young adult black dialysis patients residing in low SES neighborhoods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available