4.7 Article

Association of Body Mass Index with Outcomes in Patients with CKD

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 2088-2096

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013070754

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [1R01-DK078106-01]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obesity is associated with higher mortality in the general population, but this association is reversed in patients on dialysis. The nature of the relationship of obesity with adverse clinical outcomes in nondialysis-dependent CKD and the putative interaction of the severity of disease with this association are unclear. We analyzed data from a nationally representative cohort of 453,946 United States veterans with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). The associations of body mass index categories (<20,20 to <25,25 to <30,30 to <35,35 to <40, 40 to <45, 45 to <50, and >= 50 kg/m(2)) with all-cause mortality and disease progression (using multiple definitions, including incidence of ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine, and the slopes of eGFR) were examined in Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression models. Multivariable adjustments were made for age, race, comorbidities and medications, and baseline eGFR. Body mass index showed a relatively consistent U-shaped association with clinical outcomes, with the best outcomes observed in overweight and mildly obese patients. Body mass index levels <25 kg/m(2) were associated with worse outcomes in all patients, independent of severity of CKD. Body mass index levels >= 35 kg/m(2) were associated with worse outcomes in patients with earlier stages of CKD, but this association was attenuated in those patients with eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Thus, until clinical trials establish the ideal body mass index, a cautious approach to weight management is warranted in this patient population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available