4.7 Article

APOL1 Variants Associate with Increased Risk of CKD among African Americans

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1484-1491

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013010113

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01DK076770, R21DK073482]
  2. Johns Hopkins University from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [N01-HV-48195]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [N01-HG-65403]
  4. NIH/NHLBI [T32HL007024]
  5. NHLBI [HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, HHSN268201100012C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although case-control studies suggest that African Americans with common coding variants in the APOL1 gene are 5-29 times more likely than those individuals without such variants to have focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, HIV-associated nephropathy, or ESRD, prospective studies have not yet evaluated the impact of these variants on CKD in a community-based sample of African Americans. Here, we studied whether the APOL1 G1 and G2 risk alleles associate with the development of CKD and progression to ESRD by analyzing data from 3067 African Americans in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study who did not have CKD at baseline. Carrying two risk alleles associated with a 1.49-fold increased risk of CKD (95% CI=1.02 to 2.17) and a 1.88-fold increased risk of ESRD (95% CI=1.20 to 2.93) compared with zero or one risk allele; associations persisted after adjusting for European ancestry. Among participants who developed CKD, those participants with two risk alleles were more likely to progress to ESRD than their counterparts with zero or one risk allele (HR=2.22, 95% CI=1.01 to 4.84). In conclusion, APOL1 risk variants are risk factors for the development of CKD and progression from CKD to ESRD among African Americans in the general population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available