4.7 Article

Aberrant Tubuloglomerular Feedback and HIF-1α Confer Resistance to Ischemia after Subtotal Nephrectomy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 483-493

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2011020130

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Vererans Affairs Research Service
  2. [NIH-K08-DK084305]
  3. [R01-DK28602]
  4. [P30-DK 079337]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nephron loss in a diseased kidney invokes adaptations in the remaining nephrons. Whether and how these adaptations condition the response of the kidney to injury is not known. We examined the susceptibility of the kidney after subtotal (5/6th) nephrectomy (STN) to ischemic injury in rats. GFR in STN kidneys did not significantly change after ischemia reperfusion (IR), whereas GFR fell by 70% after IR in unilateral nephrectomy controls. In micropuncture experiments, single-nephron GFR responses mirrored the whole-kidney responses: in STN, single-nephron GFR decreased by 7% after IR compared with 28% in controls. Furthermore, we found that tubuloglomerular feedback, a mechanism that links proximal tubular injury to a fall in GFR, was inoperative in STN but was normal in controls. Restoration of normal feedback in STN attenuated the functional resistance to IR. In addition to the functional resilience, the morphology of the kidney was better preserved in STN. In STN kidneys, the S3 segment of the proximal tubule, normally injured after ischemia, constitutively expressed hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha), which is cytoprotective in ischemia. Inducing HIF before IR improved GFR in control animals, and inhibiting the HIF target hemeoxygenase-1 before IR reduced GFR in STN animals. Taken together, these data suggest that fewer functioning nephrons in a diseased kidney do not increase the susceptibility to injury, but rather, hemodynamic and molecular adaptations in the remnant nephrons precondition them against ischemic injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available