4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Standard versus high-dose CVVHDF for ICU-related acute renal failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1233-1238

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2007111173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000032] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000032, M01 RR-00032] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of dosage of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) on survival in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) is unknown. In this study, 200 critically ill patients with ARF were randomly assigned to receive CVVHDF with prefilter replacement fluid at an effluent rate of either 35 ml/kg per h (high dosage) or 20 ml/kg per h (standard dosage). The primary study outcome, survival to the earlier of either intensive care unit discharge or 30 cl, was 49% in the high-dosage arm and 56% in the standard-dosage arm (odds ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.32; P = 0.32). Among hospital survivors, 69% of those in the high-dosage arm recovered renal function compared with 80% of those in the standard-dosage arm (P = 0.29); therefore, a difference in patient survival or renal recovery was not detected between patients receiving high-dosage or standard-dosage CVVHDF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available