3.9 Article

Accumulation of microvascular target organ damage in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 542-549

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.04.008

Keywords

Microcirculation; retinopathy; aldosterone; capillaroscopy

Funding

  1. Hellenic Society of Hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early identification of hypertensive target organ damage (TOD) emerges as important for global cardiovascular risk assessment. Retinal vascular alterations, capillary rarefaction, and microalbuminuria represent different forms of microvascular TOD. However, data regarding their concomitant presence in the early stages of hypertension, the association of the number of affected organs with cardiovascular risk, and aldosterone effect on multiple TOD are lacking. We studied naive, never-treated patients with recent duration of hypertension and healthy volunteers. Innovative software was developed to estimate retinal vascular diameters and capillary density. Biochemical parameters including microalbuminuria and serum aldosterone were derived. Framingham Risk Score was used to determine cardiovascular risk. In total 103 subjects, 66 hypertensives and 37 normotensives, were included. Hypertensive patients exhibited a greater number of affected target organs compared with noimotensives (P = .014), with retinopathy and capillary rarefaction (40.9%) representing the most common TOD among hypertensives. The number of affected organs was linearly correlated with increased Framingham score and serum aldosterone, analyzed with univariate (P < .001 and P = .002) and multivariate analysis (P = .025 and P = .004), respectively. Physicians dealing with hypertensive patients should be aware of the possibility of diffuse microvascular impairment and seek multiple TOD even in the early stages of hypertension. (C) 2014 American Society of Hypertension. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available